
STS 1 Space Shuttle Columbia
It’s the year 2011, the last of the space shuttle missions are scheduled, STS 133-135, the final flight begins June 28th and then an era comes to a close. I’ll not reminisce the 30 years of STS missions, only take a moment to give thanks to all the men and women who contributed to such a wonderful and powerful program, your efforts should never be forgotten.
I would like to focus on what comes next for our space flight program, that being…? Come to think of it what does come next? Sitting now on launch complex 39A at Kennedy Space Center is the mighty…well, nothing. WOW, what has happened? American has suddenly gone from the super power in space technology development and flight to hitch hikers, hey Russia or China can you make a little room on your next flight to the International Space Station?
Really?! America is the land of innovation, progressive thinking, of moving forward towards the greater good of mankind…and yet in a few short months American will clip its wings with regard to manned space flight, how did we allow ourselves to fall to this new low?
I know, let’s build a new war machine, let’s create a new entitlement program that promotes a lethargic attitude and behavior in our citizens, let’s continue to invest money in fossil fuels and NOT research and develop new energy alternatives, and the list goes on.
Dr. Robert Zubrin believes in and supports a manned mission to Mars, with the intent to sustain a presence on the planet, heck I’m all for just making sure we have a means to get people into space at this point.
Space, there’s no money it in. Really? As we go about depleting our planet of natural resources we do this with full knowledge that out there, in space including our very own moon are the resources we could use such as Helium-3. Would it be more expensive to collect? You better believe it. If we continue to consume Earth’s natural resources will we eventually destroy our home world? You better believe that as well. But it’s so expensive to take on such challenges, to go to the moon, to mine asteroids, to establish a permanent and lasting presence in space. The cost to our very lives will be so much more when the Earth is no longer capable of sustaining the human species.
So why is it that we have utterly failed to continue what President Kennedy started, the challenge he issued to Congress and to humanity (watch and listen to his speech in 1961)? The economy, education, lack of interest, lack of a space technology industry. A lot goes into why, it simply cannot be boiled down to one particular issue but behind every issue I think it is more than fair to say complacency and lack of motivation is a major factor. Wow that really hurts. It’s hard to get to space, to stay there. If this were easy everyone would be doing it, no? It takes a

A future Astronaut
special kind of person, a special kind of people, and a special nation to move the human race into the great vastness of space. Are we not those people any longer? I think we are.
I think we have lost something our founding fathers had, a quality that made America what is was not too long ago. The spirit of discover! We’ve become so focused on our individual lives that we no longer look outward, to the betterment of ourselves as a country, as a race, collective of our planet. I know, let’s play a video game and things will get better, Uggh!
I started out with the fact that within the year America retires its shuttle fleet, with nothing on ready to replace it. Let’s get back to that. NASA was mandated by law to develop the next Heavy lift transportation system to continue carrying us into space. There was once a sense of accomplishment when saying we do more with less, now the saying is we do less with less. The year 2011 sees yet again deep budget cuts for NASA:

Sen. Richard Shelby
“The president’s proposed NASA budget begins the death march for the future of U.S. human spaceflight,” Sen. Richard C. Shelby (R-Ala.) said Monday. “If this budget is enacted, NASA will no longer be an agency of innovation and hard science. It will be the agency of pipe dreams and fairy tales.”
But Sen. Bill Nelson (D-Fla.), whose state stands to lose 7,000 jobs when the space shuttle program ends next year, signaled that he will not fight to keep Constellation alive: “When the president says he’s going to cancel Constellation, I can tell you that to muster the votes and overcome that is going to be very, very difficult.”

Sen. Pete Olson
Sen. Pete Olson “The Administration’s Fiscal Year 2011 budget will shut down America’s ability to continue human space flight by killing the Constellation program within NASA. Constellation is the best option to get to the Moon and beyond. The Moon should be our first destination so that we can develop the expertise and systems necessary to go even further.”
“NASA has sent Congress a report stating that it cannot meet the requirements that it produce a heavy-lift rocket by the current 2016 deadline – or under the current allocated budget. In the NASA Authorization Act of 2010, NASA was directed to develop a heavy-lift rocket in preparation to flights to an asteroid and possibly Mars. NASA said it cannot produce this new rocket despite the fact that the agency would be using so-called “legacy” hardware – components that have been employed in the shuttle program for the past 30 years. NASA would also utilize modern versions of engines used on the massive Saturn V rocket.”
Please do keep in mind that should NASA be held to the letter of the law, which this is a law mandated by congress for a Heavy Lift vehicle, with the lack of appropriate funding it will of couse be built by the lowest bidder. I, for one who would love to travel into space, would not get onto a rocket filled with liquid hydrogen and oxygen built by the lowest bidder…come on Mr. President, how about you take the first ride, and please do include me in your Will. Do include the fact that NASA has been tasked to use “legacy” components fromthe shuttle program , meaning technology that dates back as far as the 30 years of the shuttle program might be incorporated into a new vehicle. I think it a great idea to build upon what we have learned from the shuttle program but to specifically use outdated technology to carry us the next 30 years…really. I can’t tell you how upset I would be if I found out my new car was utilizing 30 year old parts that just happened to be sitting on the shelf. So now design engineerings must take this dated technology and build it into a new program. I guess maybe it’s not all bad, as at least that part will have been built by some one other than the lowest bidder.
And now our 2020 return to the lunar surface has been cut all together. So is it that America has resigned itself to a back seat in space exploration? At the time of this writing is seems so. I propose that the next big challenge is not getting back into space however convincing our politicians there is a want to get back into space or ramping up private industry to take on this challenge as it seems our government is slightly more focused on welfare.